Understanding the Psychological and Social Determinants of Drunk

Advisor(s)

Dr. Jessica Swanson

Dr. Robert Carrothers

Confirmation

1

Document Type

Poster

Location

ONU McIntosh Center; Activities Room

Start Date

24-4-2026 12:00 PM

End Date

24-4-2026 12:50 PM

Abstract

Drunk driving continued to be a major public safety issue, and repeat offenses showed that punishment alone was not always effective. This study examined the psychological and social factors that contributed to drunk driving recidivism among college students, with a focus on impulsivity, risk perception, and peer influence. The goal was to better understand why some individuals continued to drive under the influence even after facing consequences.

Data for this study were collected through a Qualtrics survey completed by 136 college students. The survey included questions about beliefs surrounding recidivism, levels of impulsivity, and experiences with peer pressure. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were used to identify patterns, particularly across different class standings.

The results showed that upper-level students tended to report higher impulsivity and more exposure to peer pressure, while also being more likely to believe that drunk driving was a repeated behavior. Most participants also agreed that peer influence played a major role in these decisions.

Overall, the findings suggested that drunk driving could not be addressed through punishment alone, and that prevention efforts should focus more on social influences and decision-making behaviors.

This document is currently not available here.

Open Access

Available to all.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 24th, 12:00 PM Apr 24th, 12:50 PM

Understanding the Psychological and Social Determinants of Drunk

ONU McIntosh Center; Activities Room

Drunk driving continued to be a major public safety issue, and repeat offenses showed that punishment alone was not always effective. This study examined the psychological and social factors that contributed to drunk driving recidivism among college students, with a focus on impulsivity, risk perception, and peer influence. The goal was to better understand why some individuals continued to drive under the influence even after facing consequences.

Data for this study were collected through a Qualtrics survey completed by 136 college students. The survey included questions about beliefs surrounding recidivism, levels of impulsivity, and experiences with peer pressure. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were used to identify patterns, particularly across different class standings.

The results showed that upper-level students tended to report higher impulsivity and more exposure to peer pressure, while also being more likely to believe that drunk driving was a repeated behavior. Most participants also agreed that peer influence played a major role in these decisions.

Overall, the findings suggested that drunk driving could not be addressed through punishment alone, and that prevention efforts should focus more on social influences and decision-making behaviors.